Saturday, September 05, 2009

Dragon*Con Update: Day 2

Today was a good day. I passed Karen Allen, that's Marion Ravenwood from "Raiders of the Lost Ark" and the most recent Indiana Jones movie, on the escalators, got a picture with Malcolm McDowell and R2D2, saw Draco Malfoy, and listened to Kyle Reese (Michael Biehn) speak at a panel. Been seeing lots of crazy costumes too.

Zombie Hunters had a great screening last night in front of a large audience when it played in front of a very depressing feature film (why the pairing, I'm not sure), and we got a great response this past evening as well. Its great watching this with a large audience and seeing where people laugh and don't laugh. Sometimes its very surprising the reactions we get, but the zombie baby kick still gets the biggest laugh.

I've been trying to upload a few pics, but the website keeps failing every time I attempt to publish. Sorry 'bout that, I'll give it a try again later, but for now, its time to step back out into this crazy world.

--Cbake

Friday, September 04, 2009

Dragon*Con Update 1

Got into town last night at 9:15, found a parking space and started walking toward registration to pick up my badge, which closed at 10:00 pm. Got to that hotel at 9:45 and had some employee tell me I was too late and they were cutting off the line. She was being extremely unhelpful. I walked past her to the Info booth, and no one there knew exactly what was going on, so the told me to check the VIP section.

I didn't know if I was VIP or not (my email wasn't working) but went anyway. Luckily, I was. So I got my badge last night, everything's groovy. Except this morning I found out I'm actually NOT VIP, I just have a 4-day Comp Pass that I had to pick up at VIP. That's disappointing.

Lots of crazy costumes around. Trying to decide whether or not to wait in line to get an expensive picture with certain celebrities...

--Cbake

Thursday, September 03, 2009

Dragon*Con, here I come!

A few months ago I submitted the short film I made last year, "Zombie Hunters", to the Dragon*Con Independent Film Festival in Atlanta, Georgia. From what I've been told, Dragon*Con is like the east coast version of Comic-Con, albeit with less studio interference and with more people dressed in crazy costumes.

Well, "Zombie Hunters" got accepted and will have three screenings throughout the weekend. So I got a free pass to the entire Con, and I'm excited. This will be my first Dragon*Con experience, and something tells me I am woefully underprepared for just how intimidating and huge and fun and exciting this will be.

And the list of celebrities in attendance! Here are a few of the ones I'm excited about seeing:

William Shatner
Leonard Nimoy
Patrick Stewart
Kate Mulgrew
Brad Dourif
Charisma Carpenter
Malcolm McDowell
Terry Gilliam
Mc Chris
Thomas Dekker
Peter S Beagle
Peter Mayhew
Doug Jones
Doug Bradley
Eric Roberts
Anthony Daniels
Michael Biehn

Needless to say, I can't wait. I'm spending the day running errands and trying to pack and make sure I bring everything that I need. I'll try and update if I ever get the chance to do so, and bring you pictures and interesting experiences. I hope "Zombie Hunters" is well received and that we have a great weekend! I'm sure we will, just looking at the overwhelming schedule of events!

--Cbake

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Movie Reviews: "Battle Royale" with BONUS "Tokyo Gore Police"!

"Battle Royale", Japanese, dir. Kinji Fukasaku (2001)
So after I returned "Infernal Affairs" and "Kwaidan", I walked into VisArt unsure of what to get next. I went back to the Asian film section and slowly glanced around, hoping something would jump out at me. Park Chan-Wook's "Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance" and "Lady Vengeance" were nowhere to be seen. The Miike section was empty of any films I had heard of. Kurosawa I'm saving for later.

And then BAM, it hit me. An ordinary, unassuming cardboard colored box with a symbol, the letters "BR" surrounded by an olive branch, stamped upon it. "BATTLE ROYALE". My hand shot out and snatched the box off the shelf. "BATTLE ROYALE". I've been waiting to see this movie for nine years, and finally, I had it in my hands.

A little background on the Japanese film and why its taken me nine years to watch it. I first saw a trailer on the internet for "Battle Royale" when I was a freshman in college. It promised a violent film about high schoolers who are sent to an island to kill each other until one is left standing. This was hot on the heels of the Columbine incident, which was still fresh in Americans' minds, and so it is of no surprise that the movie never found a distributor here in the states, not even for a DVD release. And so, after a few years, I had forgotten about it. It never came out in theaters, I couldn't go buy it (and didn't try to online, assuming there was no Region 1 release for it), and it would never come on television. So when I saw it sitting on the shelf, I had to see it, because I've been anticipating it for close to a decade, as strange as that sounds to my young ears.

As I said before, "Battle Royale" is a violent film. It takes place in a not-to-distant future Japan where a terrible economy has caused record numbers of unemployment and has made the Japanese youth apathetic, disrespectful, and unruly. To combat this, and to show the young people that adults are still in charge, the government creates the Battle Royale program, where one class from among all the schools in Japan is chosen by lottery to participate.

This particularly not-so-lucky class thinks they are going on a field trip, but as they drive down the highway, they pass masked military men, and soon they are all gassed and knocked out. When they awake, they are in a derelict classroom and surrounded by soldiers. Their old teacher, Kitano (played by Beat Takeshi Kitano, who most American audiences will know as one of the co-hosts of Spike TV's "Most Extreme Elimination Challenge {MXC}"), who quit his job after one of the students stabbed him, shows up and reveals himself to be the man in charge. While the confused students demand answers, Kitano plays for them a humorous video that explains their situation.

Hosted by a cute Japanese girl dressed in a ridiculous outfit, she describes how the "game" is played through her cutesy sing-song voice. She tells them that they are on an island whose inhabitants have been evacuated. Each student will receive one bag that has some bread and water, a map of the Island, a flashlight, and one weapon. Every bag is different, so while some lucky students may get a knife, a sword, or even a gun, some unfortunate kids may receive binoculars or even a pot lid as a weapon.

And oh yeah, every student has been fitted with a metal collar. Once they learn that they are being made to kill each other, they erupt in anger. One particular student, the one who stabbed Kitano in school, rages against the teacher, and Kitano pulls out a remote and presses a button. Suddenly, the student's collar starts beeping, and he frantically darts about the room pleading with his friends for help, who all try to get as far away from his as possible. When the beeping stops, the collar explodes, blowing out his throat and causing blood to spray everywhere.

If, after three days, there is not one student remaining, if they try to protest and refuse to kill each other, then everyone's collars will explode. Each student is called forth one by one, given a pack, and pushed out of the building and into the wilderness. And so the "game" begins.

Its an interesting premise to be sure. What I most enjoyed about this film were the questions it brings up, particularly in the realm of "what would I do", and the filmmakers present almost every option. Would I refuse to fight? Would I commit suicide with my girlfriend, being unwilling to kill my friends or force them to kill me? Would I be a loner, shunning my friends, telling them to run far away so that we wouldn't have to confront each other? Would we band together? Could we trust each other?

Could you? It seems the level of trust between you and your friends would only be as strong as the weakest person. The weakest person would be the most scared and therefore would be the riskiest member, the one who, afraid we might turn on him or her, would act in self-defense and shoot us first. Its a very scary premise, and it had me thinking throughout the film about my own senior class, deciding which groups and cliques would stay together, and which ones would kill each other due to infighting.

High school is rife with backstabbing, double-crossing, hormone-driven, emotional creatures that don't hesitate to get what they want. The school slut might have stolen one girl's boyfriend in the past; you can bet that animosity will come to play when both girls are armed with weapons. That quiet, loner whom you suspected had sadistic tendencies might turn out to be a merciless killer. Or, he could be an empathetic hero. Its full of possibility, and I was fascinated, riveted with the story and wondering how it would play out.

It plays out as an ensemble film with a focus on a couple that has yet to express their true feelings for each other, but the film goes to different parts of the island to see how the different groups or individuals are handling their new situation. Often, we are shown flashbacks of the characters to see what their life was like before the Battle Royale, to see how their relationships were before they were forced to kill each other, to understand why this person acts the way she does, be it childhood trauma or a sour experience in school.

I particularly enjoyed one character who, with his friends, attempts to hack into the computer system that monitors and controls their electronic collars. He takes inspiration from his uncle, an outspoken, rebellious critic of authority and government, and he sees this as their chance to fight for freedom, to take up the cause and strike back. He sends his friends out for materials that will give them enough explosives to blow up the school. How's *that* for a metaphor.

As the body count rises and the number of students dwindle, we come to an ending that, for me, didn't make much sense upon first viewing. The teacher, Kitano, is given a few scenes that make him downright sympathetic in the end, but his final scene is so bizarre that I'm still not sure what to make of it. But its far from a dealbreaker; it just strains believability by just a hair.

"Battle Royale" isn't the violent bloodbath you might expect (much of the bloodletting is due to gunfire and the majority of it is computer-generated), and its a shame that the stain of Columbine prevents this fine example of satiric filmmaking from being released to a wider, American audience. I hear there have been rumblings of an American remake, and I pray they do it right. As the film finished, I started thinking of how I would remake the film, and I would relish the opportunity to be a part of it. The premise is rich with potential to explore angsty teenage school life, America's obsession with violence, and reality tv culture. God, I wish I could be a part of it.


*BONUS REVIEW!!!*

"Tokyo Gore Police", Japanese, dir. Yoshihiro Nishimura (2008)

The day after I watched "Battle Royale", my girlfriend and I drove up to Chapel HIll for the weekend to watch her brother graduate from college. We stayed with friends, and I noticed that the boyfriend had "Tokyo Gore Police", a weird film I had heard much about on movie websites throughout the year. I didn't know it had been released on DVD already in the states, so he and I sat down to watch it that night while the girls stepped out.

Uhm. Three words. What. The. F#$%.

--Cbake

Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Wait Wait Wait, a Topless Miss California Gets to Keep Her Crown?

So, let's get the facts straight here:

1. Miss California, Carrie Prejean, SIGNS a CONTRACT with the pageant saying "I've never posed for nude pictures".

2. Within the past two weeks, a photo popped up from her early modeling career in which Prejean was topless, though no breasts or nipples were shown. Still, she was topless, thus violating the contract and making Preajean a liar.

3. Prejean says "That's the only one," adamantly stating this was the only time she ever posed topless.

4. One day later, another photo from the same shoot, Prejean still topless, surfaces online.

5. People say she's being unfairly attacked for her anti-gay marriage views.

6. Yesterday, MORE pictures from her modeling career surface, these taken only within the past YEAR.

7. Said pictures actually show Prejean with breasts and nipples exposed. Even though she is technically wearing a top, a full breast and nipple has to be edited out when shown by mainstream media.

This effectively makes Carrie Preajean a LIAR twice over. One, she lied to the pageant when she signed a contract saying she had never posed topless or nude (both of which she had done). Two, after the first pictures surfaced, she said those were the only ones, that was the only time she did it.

And yet these new pictures definitely show her partially nude. There is no getting around it, but she is trying, claiming it was "a windy day" and her top somehow blew off her breast.

Give me a f**king break. What really pisses me off, however, is that Donald Trump, who heads the pageant, has decided to KEEP Miss California and will NOT revoke her crown. This is a girl who has posed nude and lied about it to the pageant AND to the public, and yet Trump is basically saying "Hey, that's okay!"

Yeah, GREAT role model you've got there, Donald. I'm calling bulls**t.

--Cbake

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Movie Reviews: "Infernal Affairs" and "Kwaidan"

This past week I watched two more foreign films from Asia, Hong Kong's crime drama "Infernal Affairs" and Japan's ghost-story anthology "Kwaidan".

"Infernal Affairs" (2002) tells the story of two intertwined characters: one, a cop who has been working undercover as a thug in the local crime gangs for ten years, the other, a criminal working as a mole in the police department for the local gang boss. If this story sounds familiar, it should. Martin Scorsese's Oscar-winning film "The Departed" (2007) was a remake of this movie.

It was interesting to watch the original film and see where William Monahan, screenwriter of "The Departed", deviated and where he stayed faithful. Surprisingly, one of the bigger set pieces from "The Departed", a scene where the mob engages in a drug deal with a rival gang while being watched and monitored by the police, occurs extremely early in "Infernal Affairs", I believe within the first act. It is here that both sides, criminal and police, realize they have a mole in their outfit, as both detectives try to alert their side to what's happening.

Other than this reshuffling of events, the film remains very similar to Scorsese's, including the deaths of the two father figures (criminal and moral), and the way in which both detectives realize the identities of their spy-counterpart.

The biggest difference between the films is the handling of the corrupt detective, Det. Lau in "Affairs", Colin (Matt Damon) in "Departed". In "Affairs", there is a very distinct conflict raging within Lau as he wrestles with his duty to Boss Sam and his increasing desire to be a "good guy". In "Departed", I never once thought that Damon's character wished to be a normal detective, fighting crime. In both cases, the character receives a promotion and is in the process of moving into a new place with his beautiful girlfriend.

Certainly this weighs heavily on both characters' minds, but in "Departed", Damon makes his decision to cut ties with his former gang as a result of a revelation and a betrayal. It feels like an emotional reaction to bad news rather than a thoughtful and debated conclusion. In "Affairs", Lau makes the decision because he has chosen to be the "good guy" (his girlfriend, a writer, has been struggling with a new character in her book, trying to decide which side of the moral spectrum he falls into) and he wants to put his criminal past behind him.

This is a huge difference between the films. Both deal with the nature of morality and show how easy it is to blur the line between good and evil, cop and criminal. But while the good detective character (DiCaprio, Tony Leung) remains a hero in both movies, never going over to the Dark Side, "Affairs" treats the bad detective differently than "The Departed" does, giving him an air of tragedy.

The final sequence is much different than in "The Departed" (surprisingly so), and the closing shot left me feeling quite sad, whereas the final scene of "The Departed" was cathartic and left me feeling vindicated. In both films the obvious villains are the criminals, but only in "The Departed" is the mole-detective treated as such. I hated Matt Damon's character. He was a real asshole. I definitely could not say the same about Detective Lau in "Affairs".

Another large difference is the way in which the deaths are treated in this film. After a major character is killed, the film usually flashes back to moments of that character's life (in black and white) and is accompanied by a somber voiced female singing a song of woe. Western audiences might find this to be cheesy, but this could be typical of Hong Kong dramatic filmmaking. "Infernal Affairs" is still a good, taught drama, and I recommend it for fans of "The Departed" and anyone who enjoys a good crime yarn.

"Kwaidan" (1964) is a ghost-story anthology told in four parts. Indeed, the word "kwaidan" means "ghost story" in the broadest sense, but deeming a tale as such gives it an old-fashioned connotation of belonging to an older period of Japan's history (and separates it from newer Japanese horror like "The Ring" and "Ju-On"). So it is of no surprise that none of the four stories take place in contemporary Japan. The film is based on Lafcadio Hearn's collection of Japanese folk-tales, known as "Kwaidan: Stories and Studies of Strange Things", and the four stories taken from his tome are as follows:

The Black Hair
The story of a poor samurai who leaves his loving wife for a marriage of convenience and social mobility elsewhere. After years of an unhappy (yet socially and monetarily profitable) marriage, he begins to miss his former wife and true love, and regrets his decision. The samurai sets out for his old home, but what he finds there will shock and horrify him.

The Woman of the Snow
The story of a woodsman and his apprentice who get lost in a snowstorm and are visited by a snow-demon or snow-vampire; a beautifully pale woman dressed all in white. She kills the elderly woodsman, blowing her icy breath into his body and stealing away his blood. She permits the apprentice to live under the condition that he promise to never tell anyone what happened that night, and if he does, she will return to kill him. The apprentice goes back to town and lives his life, soon gaining a young wife and children. Years later, however, he feels the urge to discuss the event with his wife, which may lead to disastrous results

Hoichi, the Earless
The story of a blind musician living at a monastery who can masterfully sing The Tale of the Heike that retells the Battle of Dan-no-ura, an epic sea-battle between the rival gangs of the Genji and the Heike. The monastery sits near the cliffs of that ancient battle, an area that is said to be haunted by all those who lost their lives during the war. One night he is visited by a mysterious stranger, beckoning him to come and sing for his master. As he is blind, Hoichi does not realize this is the ghost of one of the Heike samurai. After a few nights of stealing away to play for his new masters, his curious co-workers at the monastery follow him. They find him singing in a graveyard to a bunch of tombstones, so they drag him back to the priest, thinking him bewitched.

The priest determines that another night singing to the ghosts will put Hoichi permanently under their spell- and they'll "tear him to pieces", so the priest, in a very memorable moment, paints holy words and texts over every inch of Hoichi's body. This will render the musician invisible when the ghost returns. Unfortunately, the priest forgets to paint Hoichi's ears, and based on the title of the story, you may be able to figure out what happens next. The samurai, after all, must provide proof to his master that he attempted to find Hoichi, and only being able to see the musician's ears, he decides to take those back with him...

In a Cup of Tea
In what may be one of the coolest ideas, but also the shortest and most incomplete story, "In a Cup of Tea" is about a rule-breaking samurai who, when filling his bowl with refreshing tea, sees the image of a pale, smiling man reflected back at him. Dumping the tea, refilling it, and breaking the bowl brings no change- the creepily smiling man gets closer and closer, until soon his entire face fills the bowl. The angry and thirsty samurai finally disregards this ghostly image and drinks.

That night while on patrol in his master's house, he is visited by the smiling man who says the samurai attempted to wrong him earlier in the day (presumably by drinking the tea he was reflected in). The short-tempered samurai will have none of this and attacks the ghost, stabbing him in the shoulder and causing him to disappear. Later, three brightly colored ghosts appear and announce themselves as the smiling man's servants. They say the samurai has injured him, and in a few days they will return to deal with the samurai.

Again, the samurai basically says "Screw you" and attacks the apparitions, but through some clever camera-work and editing, the servants all disappear before they can be run through by the samurai's spear. Eventually, he is able to wound all of them, and they each disappear, but before he can celebrate they reappear unscathed. This causes the samurai to start laughing like a madman, the last desperate outburst of a man on the edge.

This story is actually a story within a story, and it is bookended by scenes of a man inspecting a writer's house, searching for him as he has disappeared. The man reads his new story (which is the ghost tale we have just witnessed). It has no ending (the writer mentioning in his notes he couldn't find one suitable enough), and as the man goes for a drink of tea, he is horrified to find the writer's image smiling back at him through the reflection.

"Kwaidan" was directed by Masaki Kobayashi, who gave the film a very artful look. Most outdoor scenes were shot in sound-stages, allowing for great control over color in the background. "The Woman of the Snow" features some beautiful sets, including painted backgrounds featuring giant, creepy eyes that represent the snow-witch while also looking like natural formations. Kobayshi transforms the mood of a scene instantly by changing the lights from warm yellows to cold, icy blues within the same shot.

The Battle of Dan-no-ura in the Hoichi tale features bright oranges and yellows and incorporates a massive amount of dry-ice created fog to give the set a beautiful, yet spooky look. In one sequence, as Hoichi's friends look for him, they find floating balls of fire, a brilliant effect that is later repeated as the graveyard Hoichi sang in is once again transformed into the ghostly temple he thought he was performing in. The balls of fire float and dance all across the set, and nary a wire is to be seen guiding them. Its an effect I hope to emulate one day.

Kobayshi also uses some interesting camerawork, especially in "The Black Hair" (a tale that may have influenced the spooky, long black hair-obsessed stories of "The Ring" and "Ju-On" aka "The Grudge"). In this story, once the samurai is driven mad and starts running through his derelict house, Kobayashi slowly dollies the camera after the samurai and, within the same shot, turns it into a canted Dutch angle to represent the descent into madness. It makes for a beautiful shot that I rewound to watch again and again.

In fact, a case could be made for Kobayshi using each story to focus on a particular aspect of filmmaking. "The Black Hair" featured some interesting camerawork, "The Woman of the Snow" some brilliant set design and lighting, "Hoichi, the Earless" special effects, and "In a Cup of Tea" editing.

"Kwaidan" was a very enjoyable film, though at times it did feel long, as none of the stories are particularly exciting. The music is extremely spartan, popping up only every once in awhile as the sound of a traditional instrument being played loudly for a brief moment, used to heighten our awareness of what's occurring in a scene. But it was a beautiful film for the most part, and I'd gladly watch it again, as I feel there is much to be learned from Kobayashi's style of filmmaking and his ability to create mood.

Well that's all for now. Next week the Asian Film Fest continues with a look at the banned-in-the United States kids-with-guns flick, "Battle Royale".

--Cbake

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Movie Review: "Memories of Murder"

So after friday night's viewing of the 1965 adaptation of Agatha Christie's murder mystery, "Ten Little Indians", I moved on to another movie about multiple murders, this one coming from South Korea. Writer/director Bong Joon-Ho, recently made famous in the States last year for his monster movie "The Host", adapts his screenplay, "Memories of Murder", from a stage play based on the real-life story of South Korea's first serial killer. Its a strong and engaging detective film that pulls you into the world of rural South Korea circa 1986, but it can often leave you as frustrated as the detectives working the case.

The film opens with a gorgeously lit close-up shot of a young boy in the fields studying an insect on a leaf. He picks it up inquisitively, uncaring toward the pain he might be causing it (perhaps a parallel to how the killer treats his victims). From there we follow a tractor as it takes our main protagonist, Detective Park Doo-Man, to the discovery of the first victim. Here we see just how ineffective and unprepared the rural investigative teams are, having had no experience with a case this gruesome. Reporters show up before the CSI and forensics teams do, and key clues- such as the imprint of one of the killer's sneakers- are erased by unobservant farmers. The crime scenes are tainted, and yet this does not deter Detective Park, a man who believes entirely in his own ability to tell who is innocent and who is guilty just by looking them in the eye.

Det. Park goes through the motions, interviewing men that knew the girl, lining up potential subjects, but holding on to the belief that he will soon solve the case. A second body is found, and with it comes a detective from the big city of Seoul, and its clear from the beginning that he and Park will butt heads- literally, as Det. Park mistakes the new Detective Seo for a rapist and attacks him, the first of Det. Park's many misjudgments of character. Park and his short-tempered partner, Detective Cho, begin to suspect the local mentally retarded boy, who was seen following the first victim around, as the killer.

Its here that we see the failures of the local police and the mistrust the public had for them- something that perhaps mirrors what all of South Korea felt at the time, as they were still under military rule at the time and would soon experience the scandal of having a student tortured to death by the government (none of this is mentioned in the film, I had to research it myself, but would be known to all Korean viewers). Short-tempered Cho, with an OK from Park, begins to beat the young man for information, and Park coaches the boy into a taped confession, which the boy does not even realize is happening.

The Seoul detective, Seo, sits back in amusement as he investigates the case on his own. After prematurely announcing they've caught the killer and posing for pictures with the press, they realize their suspect is not the killer and release him to much embarrassment. There's a shakeup within the force, and a new police chief is assigned to the case with Park, Seo, and Cho still searching for clues.

Despite their initial ineptitude, Park and Cho demonstrate they do have good detective qualities, with Park determining that since they've not found any pubic hairs at any of the murder sites (now up to 3), the killer must be hairless or shave. Seo realizes that all the murders have taken place on rainy nights. A female officer who lurks in the background for most of the film makes the connection between times of the murder and a requested song that plays on the radio station on those nights.

With these clues, they attempt to prevent the next murder from happening, but are unable due to lack of manpower. It seems the detectives are as powerless as the Korean people, and this idea is reinforced later when the detectives are shown pushing their broken down police car to jump-start it, or when they realize there is no technology in Korea to match DNA samples and that they must send their evidence to America.

My favorite sequence involves Park and Cho returning to the site of one of the murders to look for clues. They hear someone approaching and, thinking its the killer returning to the scene of the crime, hide. It turns out to be Det. Seo with a radio that plays the song the murderer requests each night he kills. At first it seems to be a red herring- is Det. Seo the killer? But soon someone *else* arrives, forcing Seo to hide behind a hill on the other side of the murder site, unaware that Park and Cho are hiding close by. This new potential suspect does some strange and unmentionable things at this site, and once aware that he's being watched, takes off. Park and Cho explode from their hiding place on one side, Seo on the other, and with confused looks to each other, the trio takes off on a choreographed chase after the suspect.

I'm trying to avoid turning this into a mere summary of the film, but this sequence allows Park and Cho to shine in front of the big city Detective Seo. Once again, Park is *sure* of the man's guilt (by looking in his eyes, remember), and he and Cho again torture and force a confession from the suspect. This is important because it becomes a common theme for the film: Park's overconfidence in himself to find the killer based on instinct, and the regrettable (and seemingly ordinary and usual) use of physical violence on suspects in order to get confessions and close cases.

Eventually, the search for the killer takes its toll on the three men. Seo looks more thin and haggard as the film progresses, and his temper reaches its breaking point. Cho can no longer contain himself (or follow the Chief's orders to stop beating up suspects) and his violent outbursts cost him his job, his health, and a valuable witness (the mentally retarded boy from earlier). Park begins to doubt himself and his "ability".

Without knowing too much of South Korea's history, I get the idea that perhaps director Bong was suggesting this was the government's fault; the detectives could never solve the case because the country's problems came from the top down. The horrible crimes and the failure of the police were indicative of the country (at the time) as a whole.

The film ends with Detective Park in the year 2003, now a businessman with children (and still using his "look me in the eyes" technique to tell if people are guilty), once again visiting the site of the first murder. A child approaches and asks what he's doing. She then tells him another man came there a little bit before, saying he once did something there and he wanted to remember. Park, out of the investigative game for an unknown time, can't help but ask what the man looked like.

"Ordinary," she says. Nothing special. And with that, Park, in a close-up, swivels his head from the side and looks straight into the camera, at us, with tears in his eyes, a shot that almost mirrors that opening close-up of the young boy; two characters without a clue.

And then the credits roll. One of my biggest criticisms of the film is how it fails to tell you what year it is (except for the opening "1986" and the epilogue's "2003". Researching the film and the true events, I discovered that there were ten murders between 1986 and 1991. I would have liked some text at the end explaining that the case remains open (though the statue of limitations is rapidly approaching), or some title cards spread throughout the film to give us a sense of how much time has passed. Watching the movie, I thought all that we had seen took place over a one year period. And maybe it did. Or maybe it was spread out over a couple of years- I have no idea, nothing ever gave us a clear indication of the passage of time.

"Memories of Murder" reminded me very much of David Fincher's "Zodiac", another film based on true events that showcased the search for a serial killer and all the red herrings and false suspects and failures that came with it. Both films showed how the obsession with finding the killer took its toll on those involved, though in the case of "Memories", we are given glimpses into the private life of only Detective Park. We don't know how the case screwed up the Chief's marriage (if it did), or what happened to Detective Seo (did he give up? Go crazy? Move back to Seoul?), though conclusions can be made about Detective Cho's fate, based on his final scenes in the film.

So, "Memories of Murder" was a very engaging film, and its got me interested into the real story and the history of South Korea at the time. Director Bong Joon-Ho is two for two with me right now (I enjoyed "The Host" quite a bit), and I very much look forward to his collaboration with "Oldboy" director Park Chan-Wook on "Snow Train".

Next up we'll continue the Asian foreign film theme with either the Hong Kong crime-drama "Infernal Affairs", which was remade as Scorsese's "The Departed", or the Japanese horror anthology "Kwaidan".

--Cbake

Sunday, April 26, 2009

"Ten Little Indians": A Movie Review

Hello faithful readers,

It has been *far* too long since my last blog posting. Since my last post, I've had some pretty consistent videography and editing work, and I'd like to say that's the reason I haven't written anything of late, but the truth is, I haven't thought of anything that interesting.

However, today I have a movie review for you all. For the past two years, I've been wanting to continue my cinematic education by watching a new movie a day; old ones, classics, indies, foreign films- it didn't matter. Then, an editor by the name of Quint at AintItCoolNews, a movie news website I've visited everyday since late 1996, created a column called "A Movie a Day" last year where he watched and reviewed a movie every day for a few months.

It inspired me to start watching films again. The problem was, I didn't go to Blockbuster anymore partly out of economic reasons, but partly out of laziness too. And while NetFlix would be the best bang for my buck, being cheap and easy, I felt the need to support my local indie video rental store, VisArt. The problem was, I could never bring myself to drive over to Visart, despite the fact that its only a few blocks away.

All that changed last friday as I found myself at the very corner of 7th St and Pecan Ave where VisArt is located. After having spent the day getting work done, running errands, and generally being very productive, I felt it was finally time to step back into VisArt.

I hadn't been there in probably nine years. I didn't know if I even still had a membership card, and as it turns out, I had been using my father's card way back in 1999/2000 when I was looking for Akira Kurosawa films to use as research for my Senior Exit Essay project in high school.

So, I got a new card, and feeling overwhelmed by the sheer volume of incredible films, both classic and rare, I strolled through the aisles without any idea of what I wanted to watch that night, hoping a movie would jump out at me. As I made my way to the foreign film section, I remembered that I really enjoyed Korean director Bong Joon-Ho's comic horror film "The Host", and had heard his previous film "Memories of Murder", which detailed the search for South Korea's first serial killer, was quite good. So I grabbed it.

Walking through another aisle, the box for "Ten Little Indians" jumped out at me, and remembering that Agatha Christie's classic murder mystery had inspired such films as "The Usual Suspects" and "Clue", I thought it'd be a good companion to my other film about murder and mayhem.

"Ten Little Indians" is about ten strangers who are summoned to a remote location (originally an island, in this adaptation an isolated, snowy mountain mansion) by a mysterious Mr. U.N. Owen (get it? He's Mr. UNknOwen). The group is comprised of an actress, a popular young singer, a doctor, a judge, a general, a private investigator, an engineer, a secretary who was told she would be working for Mr. Owen, and two servants hired by him as well (through an agency), though no one has ever met the man.

After dinner on the first night, the servant was instructed (per Mr. Owen) to start a recording. He thought it would play music but is surprised to hear Mr. Owen (an uncredited Christopher Lee, a perfect use for a voice as awesome as his) address each guest and reveal their dark secrets. It turns out that each guest has been responsible for the death of an innocent person, and Mr. Owen intends for them to pay for their crimes. The guests discover each room has a copy of the old nursery rhyme "Ten Little Indians" hanging from the walls. Might its lyrics, with such lines as "Ten little Indian boys went out to dine; One choked his little self and then there were nine," be a clue as to how each member will meet his or her fate?

As guests are picked off one by one in line with the nursery rhyme, the survivors begin to distrust each other and conclude that Mr. Owen, the killer, is actually one of the guests pretending to be someone else. Some will pick sides, trusting one other person to help discover the killer, others will go at it alone. Some will choose to confess their guilt while others maintain their innocence in regards to the deaths Mr.Owen mentioned in his recording.

While this premise makes for a very excellent thriller, I was surprised at how light the tone was, which might be a reflection of the decade in which this was made (it was released in 1965 and is black and white). Right off the bat we're in the swinging sixties as jazzy music plays over the opening credits, an unexpected choice given the subject matter. I hardly remember any moments in which the music was tense. Most of the time it was pretty playful and often included strains of the nursery rhyme's tune. This took away from some of the tension, and I feel it didn't live up to its potential. I couldn't help but think had Alfred Hitchcock directed this film, it would have been an instant classic thriller.

That's not to say its not a good film. I very much enjoyed trying to figure out who was Mr. Owen or if he was indeed part of the group, and there was a twist at the end that I really did not see coming (I've learned the ending is different than it was in the original novel by Christie). It was interesting seeing what lines from the nursery rhyme would be used to kill each guest, as some of the lyrics involve bee stings and bear maulings, animals which I wouldn't expect to find in a snowy, mountain mansion.

This film was also the first (and maybe last) to feature a "WHODUNIT? BREAK!" in which, just before the final reveal, the film pauses for a minute and flashbacks to the previous killings to help you try and figure out who the killer is. Its a bit gimmicky (and removed from the film on DVD, you can find it in the Special Features). As I said, I was surprised by the end when all was said and done.

I was also surprised to see that "Clue", an awesome comedic adaptation of the classic board game from the 80's, is almost a straight-up remake of "Ten Little Indians". Only the guests don't get murdered in "Clue", the poor souls that visit the mansion during the mystery do. Its easy to see how "The Usual Suspects" was influenced by it too, taking the premise of random strangers thrown together by a mysterious and powerful man who knows their dark secrets and who might actually be one of the group members.

So good points:
-Christopher Lee's uncredited voice
-the rather attractive Daliah Lavi playing the actress
-the servant who looked just like Alfred Molina
-the famous premise
-the creative deaths
-the mystery

And some bad points:
-the light tone at times
-the jazzy, non-suspenseful music
-the quick resolution

I rather enjoyed the film and would like to see its other incarnations, including 1945's "And Then There Were None", the 1974 version of "Indians" (featuring Oliver Reed and Richard Attenborough) and 1989's adaptation (with Donald Pleasance and FRANK STALLONE!). And actually, I think this would be a GREAT remake for today's time. For one, its been remade so many times, so I don't think anyone can say only *one* film is a classic and can't be touched (its also been made into a stage play), and two, horror remakes are all the rage. I wouldn't turn this into a straight horror/slasher film, but I think its a great thriller and can be retooled for modern audiences. In fact, I've already written notes for an updated adaptation and will add it to my long list of future projects to one day concentrate on. So please, don't get any ideas (and please don't steal mine). If one day you see an update of "Ten Little Indians" starring a bunch of teenagers, you'll know I got screwed.

Next review will be of Bong Joon-Ho's "Memories of Murder", and while I don't have the time to do a movie a day, as much as I'd like, I'll try to make this a consistent project.

Stay tuned, True Believers,
--Cbake

Sunday, February 15, 2009

2008- The Best Year Ever UPDATE!

Forgot to add this to the list:

WORST OSCAR MISTAKE- Giving the Academy Award for Best Visual Effects to "The Golden Compass" over "Transformers". That just isn't right.

--Cbake

2008- The Best Year EVER

Well, I tried my best to put out my annual "Best and Worst" list on time this year, but its obvious I failed miserably. I'll blame it on a combination of being very busy during the final weeks of December, very busy during the month of January, *and* the problematic fact that I have had a hard time thinking of entries for the Best and Worst song categories.

But, I don't want wait until May (like last year) before offering up some unasked for opinions, so here we go.

2008. Was. The Best. Year. EVER!

BEST MOVIE- "Wall-E"
BEST MOVIE BASED OFF A COMIC BOOK- "The Dark Knight"
BEST SONG- "15 Step" by Radiohead (technically came out in 2007, but the Grammy's recognize it as a 2008 release, so I will too)
BEST TV SHOW, DRAMA- "LOST" (was there any doubt?)
BEST TV SHOW, COMEDY- "Saturday Night Live"
BEST SHORT FILM- "Zombie Hunters"
BEST MOVIE TRAILER- "Watchmen"
BEST SNL DIGITAL SHORT- "J**z in My Pants"
BEST CONCERT- Radiohead at Verizon Wireless Amphitheater
BEST BOOK THAT TOOK ME OVER A YEAR TO FINISH- "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows"
BEST SPORTING EVENT- UNC men's basketball beats Duke at Cameron Indoor Stadium (sorry for your senior night, DeMarcus Nelson)
BEST MUSTACHE- The Cap'n Hook
BEST CEREAL- Cocoa Krispies
BEST PRESIDENT- President-elect Obama
BEST DOG- Australian Shepherd (I miss you, Buddy)



And now, for the dreaded WORST...

WORST MOVIE I DIDN'T SEE- "Disaster Movie"
WORST SONG I DIDN'T LISTEN TO- "Bartender" by Rehab (a stretch... did Nickelback release anything this year?)
WORST TV CHANNEL- MTV (its a travesty what you've become)
WORST TV SHOW- *Anything* on MTV
WORST SHORT FILM- "Treevenge", which stole my idea
WORST MOVIE TRAILER- "Disaster Movie"
WORST DECISION BY A MOVIE STUDIO- Warner Brothers postponing the release date of "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince" by 8 months
WORST SPORTING EVENT- UNC loses to Kansas (very badly) in the Final Four
WORST MUSTACHE- The Hitler
WORST PRESIDENT- President Bush
WORST ECONOMIC MELTDOWN- Ours

See you in 2009 (hopefully not 2010), assuming blogger.com doesn't go out of business!

--Cbake